The Goal Subscale Epistemology was also a significant predictor of therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Goal subscale (e.g. client and therapist agreement on how to achieve the goals), F(2, 1093) = 4.92, p < .007 (R 2 = .009). 065) for the rationalist epistemology t(1093) = 2.16, p < .031, was in the positive direction. 075) for the constructivist epistemology t(1093) = 2.47, p < .014, was also in the positive direction along the Goal subscale. This was again inconsistent with the proposed hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings towards the Goal subscale in the therapist emphasis on working alliance compared to therapists with a constructivist epistemology.
The Bond Subscale Lastly, epistemology was also a significant predictor of the therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Bond subscale (the development of a personal bond between the client and therapist), F(2, 1089) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .035). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.034) was in the negative direction, but was not significant, t(1089) = –1.15, p < .249. For the constructivist epistemology, the standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.179) was significant t(1089) = 5.99, p < .0001, and in the positive direction along the Bond subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology is less inclined towards therapist emphasis on working alliance on the Bond subscale than the constructivist epistemology.
Practitioners having an effective constructivist epistemology tended to put so much more emphasis on the personal bond regarding therapeutic dating than the therapists which have a good rationalist epistemology
The present day research indicated that counselor epistemology is actually a significant predictor of at least specific regions of the functional alliance. The strongest in search of was in relation to the introduction of a good private bond amongst the customer and therapist (Bond subscale). It helps the notion from the literary works one to constructivist therapists lay an increased focus on strengthening a good therapeutic relationship characterized by, “anticipate, knowledge, faith, and you can compassionate.
Hypothesis 3-your selection of Certain Therapeutic Treatments
The next and you will latest analysis is made to address the newest forecast you to definitely epistemology will be a good predictor from specialist www.datingranking.net/swinglifestyle-review/ use of specific procedures process. Alot more specifically, the rationalist epistemology usually declaration using techniques associated with intellectual behavioural medication (elizabeth.g. pointers giving) more constructivist epistemologies, and you will practitioners that have constructivist epistemologies commonly declaration playing with techniques associated with constructivist medication (e.g. mental operating) over practitioners with rationalist epistemologies). A parallel linear regression analysis was presented to decide in case your predictor variable (specialist epistemology) will influence counselor feedback of your own standards details (therapy processes).
Epistemology was a significant predictor of cognitive behavioral therapy techniques F(2, 993) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .185). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = 0.430) was significant, t(993) = , p < .001 and in the positive direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.057) was significant and in the positive direction t(993) = 1.98, p < .05. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings of therapist use of cognitive behavioral techniques when conducting therapy than constructivist epistemologies.
Finally, epistemology was a significant predictor of constructivist therapy techniques F(2, 1012) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .138). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.297) was significant t(1012) = –, p < .0001 and in the negative direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.195) was significant t(1012) = 6.63, p < .0001, and in the positive direction. This supported the hypothesis that the constructivist epistemology would place a stronger emphasis on therapist use of constructivist techniques when conducting therapy than rationalist epistemologies.
Leave a Reply